AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
13 paragraphs · 205 wordsThrough the medium of this petition under Section 561ACr. P. C., the petitioners seek quashing of complaint titled Muzaffar Ahmad Vs. K. L.
Dhar and others, pending before Judicial Magistrate First Class, Banihal, under Sections 323/504/420/506 RPC.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
During the course of hearing of this petition, it transpired that the learned Magistrate had issued process against the petitioners on the basis of the
statements of the complainant and his witness, Mohammad Iqbal, which statements appeared to have been recorded without administering oath.
These statements could not, thus, form basis for considering issuance or otherwise of process under Section 204 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure.
Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure mandates the Magistrate to record the statements of complainant and his witness/s upon oath
and not otherwise.
This mandate having not been followed by Magistrate renders his order dated 20th of May, 2004 unwarranted and illegal.
In this view of the matter, order of the learned Magistrate dated 20th of May, 2004 is set aside and proceedings pending before Judicial
Magistrate First Class, Banihal, in complaint titled Muzaffar Ahmad Vs. K. L. Dhar and others, quashed.
This petition is, accordingly allowed.
