High CourtsSingle Bench(2011) 04 MAD CK 0335

K.M. Visvanathan vs The Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd. (TASMAC)

Madras High Court · Decided on 11 April 2011

HON’BLE JUDGES
M. Jaichandren, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 9058 of 2011

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 184 words

M. Jaichandren, J.—Mr. J. Ravindran, the learned Counsel, takes notice for the Respondents.

2.

Though the prayer is for a larger relief, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the second Respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated26.10.2010, within a specified period.

3.

The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court.

4.

In view of the submissions made by the learned Counsels appearing on either side, the second Respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated26.10.2010, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the representation, dated26.10.2010, to the second Respondent, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.

5.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, with the above directions. No costs. Connected M.P. No. 1 of 2011is closed.