AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
17 paragraphs · 358 wordsThe Court: Mr.Abhishek Bhattacharjee, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the award holder has relied upon an unreported Division Bench
judgment of this Court in GA No. 922 of 2017, APOT No. 89 of 2017 and EC No. 1285 of 2015 (Magma Fincorp Limited Vs. Ashok Kumar & Ors.)
dated 13th September, 2017, where the Hon’ble Division Bench had considered the aspect of service of award upon the judgment debtor.
In deciding the said application, the Hon’ble Division Bench has referred to Clause 9(b) of the arbitration agreement between the parties in the
said proceeding, Section 114 of the Evidence Act, Section 3 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act and Chapter VI of the Indian Post Office Act,
1898. Similar clause as that of 9(b) that was considered by the Hon’ble Division Bench is present in the instant arbitration agreement.
The records reveal that the envelopes said to contain the award dated 25th May, 2014 was forwarded by the Arbitral Tribunal by a letter dated 25th
May, 2014. The envelope was addressed to the respondents at the addresses mentioned in the arbitration agreement and proper stamps were affixed
thereon.
The Arbitrator has also paid postal charges by affixing prepaid adhesive postage stamps and the postal article duly put in by registered post in the
manner provided in Chapter VI of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898. Articles were dispatched on 3rd June, 2014 by registered post with AD.
Under such circumstances, it shall be presumed that the award has been duly served upon the judgment debtors. In view of the Hon’ble Division
bench judgment and having regard to the factual position as discussed above, in my view, the award holder is able to demonstrate service of the award
upon the judgment debtors.
The award which is a deemed decree is put to execution. It is submitted that the award is not under challenge. The award has now become
enforceable. The award is more than two years old. In view of the aforesaid, let a notice be issued under order 21 Rule 22(1) of the Code of Civil
Procedure upon the judgment-debtor. The matter is made returnable on 12.07.2018.
