High CourtsSingle Bench

Krapa Vijay Kumar vs State Of Ap

Andhra Pradesh High Court · Decided on 30 January 2025 · Citation: (2025) 01 AP CK 1562

HON’BLE JUDGES
K Sreenivasa Reddy, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Section 35(3), 482 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 420, 506, 509
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Petition No: 650 Of 2025
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 187 words

K Sreenivasa Reddy, J

1.

This Criminal Petition under Section 482 of B.N.S.S., is filed seeking to enlarge the petitioner/A1 on anticipatory bail in Crime No.424/2024 of Pattabhipuram Police Station, Guntur District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 509, 506 read with 34 IPC.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the State.

3.

Perused the record. On 28.12.2024 Crime No.424/2024 of of Pattabhipuram Police Station, Guntur District was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 509, 506 read with 34 IPC. The petitioner alleged to have committed the offences prior to 28.12.2024. Having heard both sides, it is seen that the offences are punishable with imprisonment of seven years and less than seven years. It is, in these circumstances, investigating Police are directed to comply with Section 35(3) of BNSS scrupulously and all the directions given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the judgment in Arnesh Vs. State Of Bihar and other related rulings.

4.

With these observations, the Criminal Petition is disposed of.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in the Criminal Petition, shall stand closed.