High CourtsSingle Bench

Krishan Ballabh vs State Of Uttarakhand & Another

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 23 June 2021 · Citation: (2021) 06 UK CK 0101

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1644 Of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 184 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following relief:

“i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing and setting aside the impugned tender notice dated 04-06-2018 (contained as

Annexure no. 1 to this writ petition) as published in newspaper on 05-06-2018 issued by respondent no. 2 after declaring the same as illegal, null and

void and this Hon’ble Court may further be pleased to proceed with and declare the result of the fourth tender process wherein three tenderers

including petitioner had participated.â€​

2.

The impugned tender notice is on record as Annexure No. 1. Perusal of the same indicates that bids were invited for providing food to the patients

of Government Doon Medical College, Dehradun for the Financial Year 2018-2019, 2019-2020, 2020-2021.

3.

Today, we are in the year 2021. The period, for which the contract was to be given, is over long back.

4.

In such view of the matter, the relief, as claimed in the writ petition, cannot be granted.

5.

Accordingly, the writ petition fails and is dismissed.