Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench

Krishna vs Sujeet Kumar Jha Drm Ner

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 10 August 2021 · Citation: (2021) 08 CAT CK 0013

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vijay Lakshmi, Member (J) · Tarun Shridhar, Member (A)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Miscellaneous. Contempt Petition No. 330, 00013 Of 2018 In Original Application No. 330, 01118 Of 2002
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 151 words

Vijay Lakshmi, Member (J)

1.

By Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Vijay Lakshmi, Member (Judicial) Shri L.S. Kushwaha holding brief of Shri G.S. Mishra, learned counsel for the

petitioners and P.K. Pandey, learned counsel for the respondents are present.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3.

Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the order in respect of which this contempt proceeding is pending has been complied in letter

and spirit. Therefore, he has prayed that the contempt proceedings may be closed.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has fairly conceded that the order has substantially been complied and therefore the contempt proceeding may

be closed.

5.

In view of the above, the instant contempt proceedings are liable to be closed and are closed and notice issued to the respondents stands

discharged.

6.

All the MAs pending in this contempt petition are disposed of as having being infructuous.