High CourtsDivision Bench

Krishna Kumar Roy vs State of Bihar and Others

Patna High Court · Decided on 25 August 2000 · Citation: (2000) 4 PLJR 713

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravi S. Dhavan, C.J · Aftab Alam, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
C.W.J.C. No.7980 of 2000
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 219 words
1.

The petitioner in this Public interest Litigation, as he claims, desires that certain enquiries be set up on whatever as cording to him, are irregularities wit his the Department of Agriculture. In this petition the petitioner has arrayed the Chief Secretary. Finance Secretary, Agriculture Secretary, Direction Agriculture, District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, as party respondents, as well as three named respondents.

2.

This Court has already expresses its views in a matter Narendra Kumar Singh Vs. Sate of Bihar and Others, that a there be allegations to the effect that governmental function needs scrutiny. (sic) put it mildly, the nothing stops the citizens. in requiring the elected representative (sic) for that matter any elected representative to put in a question at the legislature (sic) the appropriate time. Should this be done. then the department of the Government concerned is obliged to return an answer, placed at the house. The High Court cannot be utilised to arrange for answers to citizens in a Public Interest Litigation when no effort has been made to seek answers from the Government at the forum where these answers are to be given first.

3.

In the circumstances, this Court is laying this petition to rest as the situation is not that the petitioner is without remedy provided under the Constitution. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed.