High CourtsSingle Bench

Krishna Murthy vs State Of Karnataka

Karnataka High Court · Decided on 16 June 2021 · Citation: (2021) 06 KAR CK 0042

HON’BLE JUDGES
B. M. Shyam Prasad, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 307 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Petition No. 3503 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

30 paragraphs · 624 words

B. M. Shyam Prasad, J

1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent, and also perused the records.

2.

This petition is filed by Accused No.1 in Crime No.108/2021 registered with Kolar Rural Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections

307 read with Section 34 of IPC under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner's application under similar provisions before the

II Additional District & Sessions Judge, Kolar in Criminal Misc. Petition No.231/2021 is rejected by order dated 07.04.2021.

3.

The prosecution's case against the petitioner is that the complainant, a professional singer for over twenty years, was acquainted with the petitioner

and his sister, Smt. Renukadevi. The complainant was in relationship with Smt. Renukadevi for over eight to ten years despite the fact that he was

already married. About twenty days prior to the incident, the petitioner visited the complainant's wife/ other members of his family and informed them

about the complainant's relationship with his sister, Smt. Renukadevi and threatened of doing away with the complainant's life if he again visited his

sister. On 10.03.2021, Smt. Renukadevi contacted the complainant and insisted that he must visit her, and accordingly the complainant went to

Jannaghatta Village.

4.

The Prosecution's further case is that Smt. Renukadevi was not at home and therefore the complainant was waiting outside. The petitioner and

Accused No.2 [his mother] saw him and all of a sudden, came to him with two litres bottle of kerosene. The petitioner doused the complainant with

kerosene and the Accused No.2 held the complainant so that the petitioner could complete dousing the complainant with kerosene. Thereafter, the

petitioner lit the complainant on fire. The complainant suffered multiple burn injuries, and Smt. Renukadevi who by then had returned, took the

complainant to Vijaya Nursing Home for treatment. The complainant was later shifted to MVJ Medical College for further treatment by his wife and

other family members at the request of Smt. Renukadevi.

5.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the alleged incident is on 10.03.2021 and the complaint is filed fifteen days later on 24.03.2021.

The records indicate that when the complainant was admitted with Vijaya Nursing Home, it was reported that the complainant was injured in a stove

blast. Neither the delay nor the change in the history of the injury is explained. The complainant has been discharged even from MVJ Hospital.

6.

This Court, in the prevailing circumstances, and the fact that even according to the complainant, he was in relationship with the petitioner's sister for

over eight to ten years and the complaint is lodged after a lapse of fifteen days, is of the considered view that the petitioner has made out a case for

grant of regular bail. Therefore the following:

ORDER The petition is allowed. The petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in Cr. No.108/2021 on the file of I Additional Civil Judge [Sr. Dn.,] &

CJM Court, Kolar, subject to the petitioner executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.2 lakhs apart from offering two solvent sureties for the like sum

to the satisfaction of the Court subject to the following conditions: (1) The petitioner shall not intimidate the witnesses or tamper with the evidence, and

any violation of this condition, or any further conditions mentioned hereinafter, shall entail cancellation of bail.

(2) The petitioner shall appear before the trial Court on every date of hearing unless exempted by the Court.

(3) The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the trial Court without obtaining leave therefor from the Court.

(4) The petitioner shall furnish correct address to the concerned police, and shall inform them about the change in address, if any.