High CourtsDivision Bench(1896) 03 MAD CK 0008

Krishna Panda and Another vs Balaram Panda

Madras High Court · Decided on 7 March 1896 · Citation: (1896) ILR (Mad) 290

HON’BLE JUDGES
Subramania Ayyar, J · Shephard, J

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 139 words
1.

The effect of an award has been entirely misunderstood. An award duly passed in accordance with a submission of the parties is equivalent to a

final judgment. To give effect to it, the subsequent consent or approval of neither party is required. After an award made for a partition of joint

property neither party can sue for partition any more than he could if a decree in a suit for partition had been passed, in order that the parties

should be remitted to their previous rights, it is not enough that the award was not enforced or that even both parties objected to it. There must be

positive evidence that both parties agreed that the former state of things should be restored. There is no such evidence in this case. The appeal

must, therefore, be dismissed with costs.