High CourtsSingle Bench

Krishna Tidgam vs State Of MP

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 30 December 2021 · Citation: (2021) 12 MP CK 0092

HON’BLE JUDGES
Arun Kumar Sharma, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 437(3), 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 354, 456, 457, 506, 506(II) · Protection Of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Section 7, 8
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.64561 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 351 words

Arun Kumar Sharma, J

This is the first bail application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C.

The applicant is in custody since 30.11.2021 in connection with Crime No.303/2019 registered at P.S. Athner, District-Betul (MP) for the offence

punishable under Sections 354, 456, 457, 506, 506 (Part-II) of the Indian Penal Code and also under Section 7, 8 of the Protection of Children from

Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

As per the prosecution case, it is alleged that the applicant tried to outrage the modesty of the minor prosecutrix.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the alleged offence. The prosecutrix has

not made any allegation against the applicant. Under these circumstances, no alleged offence is made out against the applicant. He is in custody since

30.11.2021 and trial will take considerable time. There is no likelihood of applicant absconding or tampering with the evidence. Hence, he be enlarged

on bail.

Learned P.L. opposed the application and prayed for rejection of the same.

Looking to the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that this is not a case in which the applicant is required to be

kept in custody during the whole trial, but without commenting anything on the merits of the case, this application is allowed.

It is ordered that that the applicant/accused be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond for the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand

Only) with a solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court for securing his presence before the said Court on all the dates of

hearing fixed in this regard during trial and for complying with the conditions enumerated in sub-section (3) of Section 437 of Cr.P.C.

I t is further directed that the Jail authority shall comply with all the directions and guidelines issued by the Central Government and the State

Government from time to time in regard to outbreak of Covid-19 pandemic before releasing the applicant from the jail.

Certified copy/e-copy-as per rules.