High CourtsSingle Bench

Krishnan V vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 17 May 2024 · Citation: (2024) 05 KL CK 0052

HON’BLE JUDGES
Mohammed Nias C.P, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Abkari Act, 1 of 1077 — Section 55(i), 67B
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 3846 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 359 words

Mohammed Nias C.P., J

1.

This is an application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking regular bail.

2.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No. 47/2024 Bandadukka Excise Range Office, Kasargod District, for having allegedly committed an offence punishable under Sections 55(i) and 67B of the Abkari Act.

3.

The prosecution allegation is that, on 29.4.2024 at 7.10 P.M., the accused was found in possession of 1 litre of IMFL in an autorickshaw bearing Registration No. KL 14 H 9965 near an electric post No.K/RRP/74 at Bedadukka Village and thereby, committed the offences as alleged by the prosecution.

4.

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would say that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated with ulterior motives. At any rate, he points out that the petitioner is in custody since 29.4.2024 and continued custody of the petitioner is unnecessary.

5.

The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the petition and points out that the petitioner is not entitled to bail.

6.

After having considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and considering the allegation against the petitioner, the quantity involved, the fact that he has been in custody since 29.4.2024 and also, since there is no apprehension raised by the prosecution that if released on bail the petitioner is likely to abscond, I hold that bail can be granted to the petitioner.

7.

Accordingly, this application is allowed, and the petitioner is granted bail subject to the following conditions:-

i. The petitioner shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional court;

ii. The petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer as and when directed;

iii.The petitioner shall not tamper or attempt to tamper with the evidence or influence or try to influence the witnesses;

iv.The petitioner shall not be involved in any other crime while on bail;

v. If any of the conditions are violated, the jurisdictional court concerned will be empowered to take steps for cancellation of bail as per law.