AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
A preliminary objection is taken that the appeal does not lie. It is contended that the order appealed against is not an award and Dembeswar
Ssarma v. The Collector of Sibsagar (1917) 39 I.C. 637 Banshidhur Marwari v. The Secretary of State for India ILR (1926) C. 312 and Sarat
Chandra Ghose v. The Secretary of State for India ILR (1919) C. 861 are relied on. In the first of these cases the application for reference was
made beyond the time allowed. No reference ought to have been made in that case and the District Judge refused to make an award on that
ground. The High Court held properly that no appeal lay. In Banshidhur Mar-wari v. The Secretary of State for India ILR (1926) C. 312 the
appeal was against an order refusing to restore a case dismissed for default. In Sarat Chandra Gkose v. The Secretary of State for India ILR
(1919) C. 861 the order was made u/s 49 of the Act. All these cases are distinguishable.
Once a proper reference comes before the District Judge, his final order on it is an award whether he gives an additional amount or he gives no
additional amount or whether the Acquisition officer''s award is not upheld for some other reason like the one in this case. Section 27(3) of the
Land Acquisition Act supports this conclusion. The words are ""where the award of the Collector is not upheld."" This is such a case the reason
being that Government backed out of the acquisition. We overrule the preliminary objection.
As to the amount, it is stated before us-and we have no reason to disbelieve the statement-that Rs. 188 represents the total costs incurred
including vakalat, stamp, pleader''s fee and witness batta. Seeing that out of the ten adjournments which the case received, three were at the
instance of the appellant and seven at the instance of the Government, we think Rs. 120 for batta and other expenses and Rs. 20 for pleader''s fee,
that is Rs. 140, is all the sum to which the appellant is properly entitled. We accordingly modifythe order of the Court below by directing that the
respondent will pay Rs. 140 towards the appellant''s costs.
The respondent will pay the appellant''s costs for the appeal.