High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 05 CHH CK 0177

Ku. Alpana Yadav vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 18 May 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 1446 Of 2018

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 357 words

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J

1.

Heard.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was allowed to appear in the examination, as a special case, in November- December, 2017, but she could not appear for want of information from College / University side pursuant to which the Principal of the College has recommended to the University for permitting her to appear in the examination of Diploma in Civil Engineering, last semester, commencing from 19-5-2018.

3.

Learned counsel for the University - respondent No.3 submits that all those students who could not appear in the said examination for personal reasons will be allowed to appear in the examination to be held in the month of November, 2018 and in that examination, the petitioner will be permitted to appear.

4.

It is not in dispute that the petitioner was allowed to appear in the said examination, as a special case, in November-December, 2017, but the said information did not reach to the petitioner pursuant to which she could appear in the examination. It is not the fault of the petitioner, it may be the fault of the College or the other authorities, but certainly, the petitioner cannot be made to suffer for her no fault since she is eligible and permission has already been granted to her for appearing in the examination in November-December, 2017 and the University is ready and willing to permit her to appear in the examination to be held from November, 2018. Therefore, it would be expedient to direct the University to permit the petitioner to appear in the examination commencing from 19-5-2018 in Diploma in Civil Engineering, last semester, as her eligibility and qualification to appear in the examination are not in dispute. Accordingly, the University is directed to process and allow the petitioner to appear in the said examination commencing tomorrow.

5.

Mr. Pusty and Mr. Shrivastava, learned counsel appearing for the State and the University, respectively, will inform the order of this Court to the authorities concerned.

6.

With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

7.

Certified copy today.