High CourtsSingle Bench

Kuldeep Bhardwaz vs State Of Uttarakhand & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 20 January 2023 · Citation: (2023) 01 UK CK 0136

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Writ Petition No. 139 Of 2023

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 152 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

The instant petition has been filed seeking protection from respondent nos. 3 to 6, on the ground that the petitioner had lodged an FIR No.270 of 2018, under Sections 420, 323, 504 & 307 IPC, Police Station Manglore, District Haridwar against respondent nos. 3 to 6, therefore, they are extending threats to the petitioner.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. Learned counsel for the petitioner appeared through video conferencing.

3.

According to the petitioner’s case, he is a witness in the FIR. If any threat is being extended to the petitioner, he can very well file an application under the Witness Protection Scheme, as promulgated, pursuant to the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Mahender Chawla & others vs. Union of India & others, (2019) 14 SCC 615.

4.

With these observations, the instant writ petition stands disposed of.