High CourtsSingle Bench

Kuldeep Kaur vs State Of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 3 December 2020 · Citation: (2020) 12 P&H CK 0060

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Bajaj, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Narcotic Drugs And Psychotroic Substantes Act, 1985 — Section 22
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 10633 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 368 words

Manoj Bajaj, J

Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail, pending trial in case FIR No.14 dated 26.02.2019, under Section 22

N.D.P.S.Act, 1985, registered at Police Station, Kacha Pakka, Tarn Taran, District Tarn Taran. The petitioner is in custody since her arrest on

26.02.2019.

As per the allegations in the FIR, on 26.02.2019, when the police party reached near Kulla canal bridge, a woman was seen coming from the side of

village Jamalpur, who on seeing them, kept the polythene pouch in the grass and turned towards the orchard of pear. On the basis of suspicion, she

was apprehended and on search of the polythene pouch, 765 intoxicating tablets were recovered. On these broad allegations, the above FIR was

registered.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner is in custody since 26.02.2019 and only one prosecution witness has been examined so

far out of total seven witnesses. He submits that the trial is likely to consume considerable time, particularly in the prevailing condition as there is

outbreak of pandemic COVID-19 in the region and, therefore, the further custody of the petitioner may not be justified. He prays for grant of bail,

during the pendency of the trial.

On the other hand, the prayer is opposed by the learned State counsel on the ground that the recovered contraband would fall within the category of

commercial quantity. He, on instructions from SI Kulwant Singh, submits that the petitioner is not involved in any other case of similar nature.

Considering the above background, custody of the petitioner and the fact that the trial is likely to consume considerable time to conclude in the wake

of outbreak of pandemic COVID-19 in the region, this Court does not find any ground to decline the prayer. The petitioner is presently confined in

judicial custody since 26.02.2019 and her further detention may not be necessary for any useful purpose.

Resultantly, without meaning any expression of opinion on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner be released

on regular bail subject to her furnishing requisite bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate, Tarn Taran.