High CourtsSingle Bench

Kulwinder Kaur vs State of Punjab and others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 8 November 2011 · Citation: (2011) 11 P&H CK 0193

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajan Gupta, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 20703 of 2011

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 169 words

Rajan Gupta, J.—Learned counsel submits that vide order, Annexure P-1, the petitioner was transferred from Guru Teg Bahadur Government College, Sathiala (Amritsar) to Government College, Bhulath (Kapurthala). She was relieved from her post on the same day vide relieving order, Annexure P-2. However, she has not been allowed to join at her new place of posting. Learned counsel further submits that petitioner had submitted a representation, Annexure P-3 as well, but no decision has been taken on the same.

2.

Notice of motion.

3.

On asking of the court, Mr. B.S. Chahal, Dy. Advocate General, Punjab accepts notice. He submits that he has no objection if a direction is issued for decision of the representation, Annexure P-3 expeditiously.

4.

In view of above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerned authority to take a decision on representation, Annexure P-3, expeditiously, preferably within a period of two weeks.

5.

Copy of the order be given to the learned State counsel under signatures of the Court Secretary.