High CourtsSingle Bench

Kumar Rai & Anr vs Land Revenue Department & Ors.

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 24 April 2026 · Citation: (2026) 04 SIK CK 1638

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 23 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 93 words

Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J

1.

Ms. Rupal Agarwal, learned counsel submits that although Mr. Rahul Rathi, learned counsel was present in the morning before the Division Bench, he has since gone to consult his Doctor as he was unwell, accordingly, an adjournment is sought on that ground. The learned Government Advocate submits that since the adjournment is sought on personal grounds he has no objection.

2.

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that they do not want to file rejoinder to the counter affidavit filed by the respondents.

3.

List on 09.06.2026.