High CourtsSingle Bench

Kumar Tamang @ Hari Kumar Tamang vs State Of Sikkim And Others

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 13 October 2023 · Citation: (2023) 10 SIK CK 0037

HON’BLE JUDGES
Meenakshi Madan Rai, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 08 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 102 words

Meenakshi Madan Rai, J

Learned Assistant Government Advocate verbally seeks time on grounds that Learned Government Advocate Mr. Thinlay Dorjee Bhutia who was arguing this matter had to urgently attend to his newborn baby who was suddenly indisposed.

Learned Senior Advocate for the Petitioner objects to the submission seeking time, on grounds that, this matter is of the year 2020 and that he had in fact concluded his arguments.

Considering the grounds put forth, adjournment is allowed. However, the parties shall bear in mind that this is the final adjournment granted.

List this matter on 30-11-2023 as found convenient by the parties.