High CourtsSingle Bench

Kumud Vaidya vs Devender Kumar & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 5 August 2021 · Citation: (2021) 08 UK CK 0074

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908 — Order 39 Rule 3
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1383 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 339 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

Petitioner filed a suit for permanent injunction. She also filed an application seeking temporary injunction along with suit. Learned trial court issued

notices on the temporary injunction application fixing 19.07.2021. Thus, feeling aggrieved, petitioner has approached this Court challenging the order

dated 08.07.2021.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is the rightful owner of the property in question, however, defendants are trying to

encroach upon petitioner’s property taking advantage of the travel restrictions imposed due to COVID-19. Thus, according to him, learned trial

court ought to have granted ex-parte interim injunction order in favour of the petitioner.

3.

This Court does find any substance in the contention raised on behalf of the petitioner. Order 39 Rule 3 C.P.C. ordains that grant of ex-parte

temporary injunction is an exception and issuance of notice is a Rule before granting any ex-parte temporary injunction.

4.

In such view of the matter, this Court does not find any infirmity in the order impugned in the writ petition.

5.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the next date fixed before the trial court is 16.08.2021. He further submits that some of the

defendants have been served and petitioner will take Dasti Notice to ensure that the remaining defendants to the suit are also served within two

weeks.

6.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a request to learned trial court to decide

petitioner’s temporary injunction application on the next date fixed i.e. 16.08.2021 or any other date within four weeks thereafter.

7.

For a period of six weeks or till decision is taken on temporary injunction application, whichever is earlier, status quo shall be maintained qua the

land in question.

8.

However, it is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the claim made by the petitioner, therefore, learned trial

court shall consider temporary injunction application on its merits, without being influenced by the order of this Court.