High CourtsDivision Bench

Kundan Lal vs Manohar Lal

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 19 April 1929 · Citation: AIR 1929 All 588 : 117 Ind. Cas. 345

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dalal, J
RESULT
Dismissed
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 209 words

Dalal, J.—I refrain from giving my opinion as to the meaning of the word "Dassa" and the propriety of its use by Kundan Lal, as occasion may arise for a suit in the civil Court. All I have to examine is whether it would be proper to order further enquiry in the criminal Court. I am decidedly of the opinion that the time of the criminal Court should not further be wasted. Monohar Lal took his chance. The Magistrate held a careful enquiry and arrived at a certain conclusion. A Court of revision merely for the reason of disagreement with that conclusion is not entitled to order further enquiry. A further enquiry may be ordered only in cases where a Magistrate has not taken sufficient trouble or has come to a perverse decision. On the evidence on the record I am satisfied that the Magistrate tried the case with great care and patience and examined the evidence to the best of his ability. Even if he came to a wrong conclusion, a Court in revision has no jurisdiction to order further enquiry. I set aside the order of the District Magistrate and direct the order of discharge of the Magistrate Mr. H. Husain, dated 8th November 1928, to stand.