AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
18 paragraphs · 312 wordsBy way of this writ petition, the petitioners have questioned notification dated 1.12.19 issued by the Government of Rajasthan including the Gram
Panchayat, Hadda in Panchayat Samiti Mohangarh, District Jailsalmer.
It is noticed that all the notifications issued by the State Government after November, 15-16, 2019 reconstituting the Gram Panchayats and
Panchayat Samitis in the State of Rajasthan were quashed by a Bench at Principal Seat vide judgment dated 13.12.19 rendered in Jai Singh vs. State
of Rajasthan (D.B.C. Writ Petition No.17993/19). Aggrieved thereby, the State of Rajasthan preferred Special Leave Petition No.30471/19 before the
Supreme Court, wherein while granting the leave to appeal, on 8.1.19, interim order was passed in following terms: -
“Until further orders, the operation of the impugned judgment and final order dated 13.12.2019 passed by the High Court of Judicature, Rajashan at
Jodhpur shall remain stayed.â€
Later, on 24.1.2020, on the statement being made by the counsel appearing for the State Election Commission that the elections will be held in
accordance with the notifications dated 15/16.11.2019, 23.11.2019, 1.12.2019 and 12.12.2019 according to law in the second half of April, 2020, the
Supreme Court passed the order accordingly.
Thereafter, the aforesaid Special Leave Petition stands disposed of by the Supreme Court vide order dated 4.2.2020, which reads as under:-
“Learned counsel for Election Commission reiterates that the elections will be held as per order dated 24.01.2020 in accordance with law. Interim
orders dated 08.01.2020 and 24.01.2020 are hereby confirmed.
The special leave petition is disposed of in terms of the above order.
All applications stands disposed of accordingly.â€
In view of the orders passed by the Supreme Court as aforesaid, the impugned notification does not warrant any interference by this Court, the writ
petition is accordingly, disposed of in light of the order passed by the Supreme Court in Jai Singh’s case (supra)
