High CourtsSingle Bench

Lajwanti vs Rakesh And Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 8 April 2021 · Citation: (2021) 04 UK CK 0030

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908 — Order 39 Rule 2A
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Contemt Petition No. 546 Of 2017
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 166 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

This Contempt Petition has been filed for alleged violation of interim order dated 03.12.2012 passed in Second Appeal No. 133 of 2012, whereby respondents were directed not to create any third party interest or change the nature of the property.

2.

It is an admitted position that Civil Suit filed by the petitioner was dismissed by trial Court and the regular First Appeal filed by him was also dismissed by Ist, Additional District Judge, Haridwar. The order, violation whereof has been alleged, has been passed in a Second Appeal, which is continuation of the suit.

3.

Thus, this Court is of the considered opinion that petitioner has a remedy of filing appropriate application under Order 39 Rule 2-A of C.P.C.

4.

In such view of the matter, Contempt Petition is closed, with liberty to petitioner to approach the appropriate forum for filing appropriate application under Order 39 Rule 2-A of C.P.C.

5.

Contempt notices issued to the respondents are hereby discharged.