High CourtsSingle Bench

Lakhan vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 23 September 2025 · Citation: (2025) 09 MP CK 1057

HON’BLE JUDGES
Milind Ramesh Phadke, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Section 45, 483 · Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — Section 108 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 107, 306
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 43453 Of 2025
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

16 paragraphs · 553 words

Milind Ramesh Phadke, J

This is first bail application under Section 483 of BNSS filed by the applicant for grant of bail.

The applicant has been arrested on 12.08.2025 by Police Station-Dabra City, District Gwalior in connection with Crime No.513/2025, registered in relation to the offence punishable under Section 108 of B.N.S.

Prosecution story in brief is that the deceased was the wife of the present applicant. The applicant used to fight with his wife and also used to beat her, due to which she had committed suicide on 10.08.2025 by jumping from terrace. After marg enquiry, offence has been registered against the present applicant.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. He has not committed any offence. It is further submitted that there is no specific evidence of abatement against the present applicant for suicide committed by the deceased, therefore, in any manner ingredients of section 107 IPC/ Section 45 of BNSS are not made out against the present applicant, thus, the implication of the applicant by mode of Section 306 I.P.C./108 of BNS is not established. The applicant is the first offender and he has no criminal past. Trial will take time for its conclusion. The applicant is permanent resident of Dabra District Gwalior and there is no likelihood of his absconsion or tampering with the prosecution evidence. He is ready to abide by the terms and conditions as may be imposed. With the aforesaid submissions, prayer for grant of bail is made out.

Learned counsel for the State as well as counsel for the complainant vehemently opposed the application and prayed for its rejection.

Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegations and coupled with the fact that the trial is not likely to conclude in near future and prolonged pre- trial detention being an anathema to the concept of liberty, this Court is inclined to extend the benefit of bail to the applicant.

Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, this application is allowed and it is directed that the applicant be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court/committal Court for his appearance on the dates given by the concerned Court.

This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicant:-

1.

The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him;

2.

The applicant will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;

3.

The applicant will not indulge themselves in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;

4 . The applicant shall not commit any other offence during pendency of the trial, failing which this bail order shall stand cancelled automatically, without further reference to the Bench;

5.

The applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial; and

6.

The applicant will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be.

Certified copy as per rules.