High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 08 P&H CK 0019

Lakhwinder Singh and others vs State of Punjab and others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 17 August 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ajay Tewari
RESULT
Disposed
CASE NUMBER
12843 of 2002 (O&M)

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 179 words
1.

On 14.07.2017 the following order was passed :-

"The Registry has reported that the name of the counsel Sh.G.S.Singhpuria, Advocate is not found in the bar directory. However I find that his particulars are mentioned in the Vakalatnama.

Let the Registry is directed to issue notice to him at the address mentioned in the Vakalatnama. In future also, in such like cases the Registry is directed to check not only the paper book to see if the particulars of the counsel are available but also the bar directory for the District Courts of Chandigarh, Mohali and Panchkula before sending the matter to the Bench.

Adjourned to 17.08.2017."

2.

Thereafter Registry has reported that a letter has been written to

the learned counsel for the petitioner at his address and he has also been

informed about the date fixed telephonically.

3.

Even today none has entered appearance on behalf of the

petitioners.

4.

Consequently, the petition is dismissed in default.

5.

Since the main case has been decided, the pending civil

miscellaneous application, if any, also stands disposed of.