AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
16 paragraphs · 761 wordsN. Kirubakaran, J.—This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been preferred by the claimants, aggrieved over the award of Rs. 3,27,000/- passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal for the death of the 1st appellant''s son, by name, Sekar, aged about 17 years, said to have been working as an agricultural coolie and lorry cleaner, in the accident, which occurred on 04.10.2006.
Heard Mr. M.L. Ramesh, learned counsel for the appellants and Mrs. R. Sreevidhya, learned counsel for the 2nd respondent Insurance Company.
Even though a sum of Rs. 6000/- was claimed as monthly income, the Tribunal took Rs. 4500/- as his monthly income and deducted 50% towards " Personal Expenses" and arrived at Rs. 2250/- as "Monthly Contribution to the family". Adopting multiplier 11, awarded a sum of Rs. 2,97,000/- towards " Loss of Dependency" and totally, a sum of Rs. 3,47,000/- was awarded as compensation, including other amounts towards "Funeral Expenses" and "Loss of love and affection".
It is seen that the employer of the deceased was examined as P.W.3, who stated that he was paying a sum of Rs. 6000/- to the deceased for his work. In the absence of any contra evidence and when the employer himself had deposed that the deceased was earning Rs. 6000/- per month, the Tribunal ought to have taken Rs. 6000/- as monthly income. That apart, the accident had occurred in 2008, during which time, it was impossible to get manual labour for less than Rs. 6000/-. Therefore, the monthly income of the deceased is re-determined as Rs. 6000/- which is also in consonance with the judgment of the Honourable Apex Court rendered in Syed Sadiq etc. Vs. Divisional Manager, United India Ins. Company, (2014) 1 ACC 206 : AIR 2014 SC 1052 : (2014) AIRSCW 724 : (2014) 1 JT 569 : (2014) 1 RCR(Civil) 766 : (2014) 1 SCALE 377 : (2014) 2 SCC 735 . Since the deceased was aged about 17 years, as per Santosh Devi Vs. National Insurance Company Ltd. and Others, (2012) ACJ 1428 : AIR 2012 SC 2185 : (2012) 4 SCALE 559 : (2012) 6 SCC 421 : (2012) AIRSCW 2892 : (2012) 3 Supreme 197 , 50% of the monthly salary has to be added towards "Future Prospects". Therefore, the total monthly income would be,
"Total monthly income :: Rs. 6000/- + 50% (Rs.6000/-)
:: Rs. 9000/-"
Since the deceased was a bachelor, 50% is required to be deducted towards "Personal Expenses". In that event, "the monthly contribution of the deceased to the family" would be,
"Monthly contribution of the
deceased to the family :: Rs. 9000/- (-) 50% (Rs.9000/-)
:: Rs. 4500/-"
As per the judgment in Smt. Sarla Verma and Others Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and Another, (2009) ACJ 1298 : AIR 2009 SC 3104 : (2009) CLT 1055 : (2009) 6 JT 495 : (2009) 6 SCALE 129 : (2009) 6 SCC 121 : (2009) 5 SCR 1098 : (2009) 5 UJ 2280 : (2009) AIRSCW 4992 : (2009) 3 Supreme 487 , the appropriate multiplier to be adopted, considering the age of the deceased, is 18 and therefore, applying the same,
"Loss of Income :: Rs. 4500 x 12 x 18
:: Rs. 9,72,000/-"
Towards " Loss of love and affection", the Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs. 25,000/- and the same is confirmed. For "Funeral Expenses", only a sum of Rs. 5000/- was awarded and the same is enhanced to Rs. 15,000/-. Since no amount was awarded towards " Transportation Expenses", a sum of Rs. 10,000/- is awarded. Hence, the compensation of Rs. 3,27,000/- is enhanced to 10,22,000/- rounded off to Rs. 10,25,000/- together with interest @ 7.5 per annum."
It is submitted that the 2nd respondent Insurance Company has already deposited the entire amount as per the award of the Tribunal. In view of the modified award passed by this Court, the 2nd respondent is directed to deposit the balance amount, with interest and costs, before the Tribunal, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On such deposit being made, the claimants are permitted to withdraw their respective shares, as per the ratio fixed by the Tribunal, within a period of one week thereafter. The claimants shall also pay additional court fee for the enhanced amount, if any, within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
In the result, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed and the award of the Tribunal is enhanced to Rs. 10,25,000/-. No costs.
