High CourtsSingle Bench

Lalan Singh vs State Of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 7 January 2020 · Citation: (2020) 01 PAT CK 0116

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 420 · Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Section 138 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438(2)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 83059 Of 2019
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 416 words
1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant, who has suo motu appeared.

2.

The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Gardanibagh PS Case No. 410 of 2018 dated 17.09.2018 instituted under Sections 420 of the

Indian Penal Code and 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘NI Act’).

3.

The allegation against the petitioner is that he had taken money from the informant for providing land and out of which for Rs. 1 lakh a cheque was

given by the petitioner which was not honoured by the Bank.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was business dealing with regard to sale/purchase of land between the parties and in fact,

through the petitioner, the brother-in-law of the informant had bought some land but had not made full payment for which the petitioner was asking the

informant and with mala fide intention not to pay, this false case has been instituted. It was further submitted that the FIR itself is illegal as law does

not permit filing of a police case for offence under Section 138 of the NI Act. It was further submitted that in any view of the matter, the dispute is

purely civil in nature relating to money for which the informant was required to file an appropriate case before the Civil Court by way of money suit.

Learned counsel further submitted that in fact no cheque was given by the petitioner in favour of the informant and that is why the Court has not

taken cognizance under Section 138 of the NI Act.

5.

Learned APP submitted that there is allegation of the petitioner not returning the money of the informant.

6.

Learned counsel for the informant submitted that the cheque given by the petitioner was not honoured.

7.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender

before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty Five

thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub Judge XIV cum Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna

in Gardanibagh P.S. Case No. 410 of 2018, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

8.

The application stands disposed off in the aforementioned terms.