High CourtsSingle Bench

Lalit Mohan vs State Of U.T. Chandigarh

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 5 January 2026 · Citation: (2026) 01 P&H CK 1774

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vikas Bahl, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 74150 Of 2025
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 181 words

Vikas Bahl, J

1.

Learned counsel for the respondent has filed the reply and the same is taken on record. A copy thereof has been supplied to the learned counsel for the petitioner.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has very fairly submitted that the petitioner has filed a regular bail application and the petitioner be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to take up all the points, which have been raised in the present petition and are available to him in law, in the said regular bail application.

3.

Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to the said course of action and has submitted that liberty be also granted to the respondent to raise all pleas in accordance with law.

4.

Keeping in view the above-said facts and circumstances, the the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty aforesaid.

5.

It would be open to both the parties to raise all pleas which are available to them in accordance with law before the Court where the regular bail has been filed by the petitioner.