High CourtsSingle Bench

Lambodhar Baghel And Ors vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 10 May 2021 · Citation: (2021) 05 CHH CK 0047

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajani Dubey, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Chhattisgarh Excise Act, 1915 — Section 34(2), 59A(ii)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case (MCRC) No. 2671 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

24 paragraphs · 468 words

Rajani Dubey, J

1.

Heard on admission.

2.

Admit.

3.

The accused/applicants have moved this first bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for releasing them on regular

bail during trial in connection with Crime No. 20/2021 registered at Police Station Lohandiguda, District Bastar (C.G.) for the offence punishable

under Section 34 (2) of the C.G. Excise Act.

4.

It is the case of the prosecution that, on 22.03.2021, total 13.140 bulk liters of illicit liquor has been seized by the police from the custody of

applicants and thereby committed the offence. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the

crime in question. He further submits that as the applicants are in custody since 22.03.2021 and the trial is likely to take some time for its final disposal,

they may be released on bail.

5.

On the other hand, counsel for the State opposes the bail application.

6.

Taking into consideration the condition incorporated in Section 59-A(ii) of the C.G. Excise Act, 1915, and bearing in mind the principles of law laid

down in Banti Singh v. State of Chhattisgarh (M.Cr.C. No.6846 of 2014), decided on 05.01.2015), if the facts of present case are examined, it is

apparent that only 13.140 bulk liters of illicit liquor has been seized from them which is more than prescribed limit of 5 bulk liters, but looking to the fact

that the applicants are in custody since 22.03.2021, trial is likely to take some more time and further taking into account the nature and gravity of

offence and plea raised by the applicants that they have falsely been implicated in case, I am of the opinion that present is the fit case, in which, the

applicants should be enlarged on regular bail. Accordingly, the application is allowed. It is directed that on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of

Rs. 50,000/- each, with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Court for their appearance as and when directed, the applicants

shall be released on bail, subject to following conditions: That, the applicants shall furnish a specific, undertaking that while on bail, they shall not

commit any excise offence, otherwise bail granted to them shall be liable to be cancelled and shall co-operate the prosecution during trial.

7.

That, the accused/applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation before the concerned Investigating Officer as and when required and

the accused/applicants shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so

as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer.

8.

That, the accused/applicants shall not act, in any manner, which will be prejudicial to fair and expeditious trial.