High CourtsSingle Bench(2010) 12 SHI CK 0034

Lata Malhotra and Another vs State of Himachal Pradesh and Others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 27 December 2010

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajiv Sharma, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
CWP (T) No. 8291 of 2008

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 171 words

Rajiv Sharma, J.—Petitioners were working as Class-IV in the Respondent-department. They were promoted to the post of Technical Bearer vide office order dated 2nd July, 2001. They were put in the pay-scale of Rs. 2720-4260. They started discharging their duties on the promotional post. However, vide office order dated 6.3.2002 the office order dated 2nd July, 2001 has unilaterally been withdrawn. Once the Petitioners have been promoted on regular basis to the post of Technical Bearer, they ought to have been heard before the decision was taken to the detriment of the Petitioners by reverting them to the lower post. The Petitioners were required to be heard before issuance of office order dated 6.3.2002. They have suffered civil and evil consequences since their status and salary has been reduced.

2.

Accordingly, the petition is allowed. Annexure A-2, dated 6.2.2001 is quashed and set aside. However, liberty is reserved to the Respondents to proceed with the matter in accordance with law. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs.