High CourtsSingle Bench

Laxman Golari vs State Of Odisha

Orissa High Court · Decided on 21 September 2023 · Citation: (2023) 09 OHC CK 0138

HON’BLE JUDGES
G. Satapathy, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 20(b)(ii)(C)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 2663 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 723 words

G. Satapathy, J

1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).

2.

This is a bail application U/S.439 of Cr.P.C. by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Spl. T.R. Case No. 126 of 2020 arising out of Chitrakonda P.S. Case No. 111 of 2020 pending in the file of learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Malkangiri for commission of offences punishable under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of NDPS Act, on the allegation of transporting 150 Kgs. of Contraband Ganja in an auto rickshaw bearing Regd. No. AP-31-TN-0431 and Hero Splendor Pro bearing Regd. No. OR-10 J-7824.

3.

Heard, Ms. B. Sahu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. S.R. Sahoo, learned ASC in the matter and perused the record.

4.

It is brought to the notice of the Court that the present petitioner was apprehended after two years of detection of the case and his implication is on the basis of statement of co-accused.

5.

In the peculiar facts & circumstance of the case of petitioner being not apprehended with any Contraband article from the spot and after having considered the rival submissions and taking into consideration the nature and gravity of accusations raised against the petitioner and keeping in view the mode and manner of implication of the petitioner on the basis of statement of co-accused and regard being had to the mandate of law laid down by the Apex Court in Tofan Singh Vs. State of Tamilnadu; (2020) 80 OCR (SC) 641 and there being no criminal antecedent reported against the petitioner and taking into account the release of CCL (Child in Conflict with Law) on bail, who were apprehended from the spot and further taking into account the other circumstance on record in entirety, this Court admits the petitioner to bail.

6.

Hence, the bail application of the petitioner stands allowed and the petitioner is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.1,00,000/-(Rupees One Lakh) with two local solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper by it with following conditions:-

(i) the petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail,

(ii) the petitioner shall attend the trial Court on each date of posting without fail unless his attendance is dispensed with. In case the Petitioner fails without sufficient cause to appear in the Court in accordance with the terms of the bail, the learned trial Court may proceed against the Petitioner for offence U/S.229-A of IPC in accordance with law,

(iii) the petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the trial Court without prior permission till disposal of the case,

(iv) the petitioner shall report attendance before the Jurisdictional Police Station once in a week preferably on Sunday of every month in between 10 A.M. to 12 Noon for six(06) months from the actual date of release from the custody and

(v) the Petitioner shall inform the Court as well as the I.O. as to his place of residence during the trial by providing his mobile number(s), residential address, e-mail, if any, and other documents in support of proof of residence.

The I.I.C. of Jurisdictional Police Station shall not detain the petitioner unnecessarily after recording his attendance beyond the time as stipulated.

It is clarified that the Court in seisin of the case will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner without further reference to this Court, if any of the above conditions are violated or a case for cancellation of bail is otherwise made out. In the wake of aforesaid, the subsequent involvement of the petitioner in future for any offence under NDPS Act involving commercial quantity of contraband article on prima facie accusations may be treated as a ground for cancellation of bail in this case.

It is made clear that the Court in seisin of the case, while releasing the petitioner on bail may verify the residential proof of the sureties by taking the help of local police, if required to ascertain their proof of residence and such exercise must be completed within a reasonable period of not more than seven days of filing bail bonds.

7.

Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of.

8.

Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules.

……………………………