AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
32 paragraphs · 620 wordsBecause of COVID Pandemic situation, the Court proceedings are conducted through Video Conferencing.
Heard Mr. K. Talukdar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms. S. Jahan, learned Addl. PP for the State.
By this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the petitioners, namely, 1. Laxmi Agarwal and 2. Saina Agarwal have prayed for granting them pre-arrest
bail, apprehending arrest in connection with Bharalumukh P.S Case No. 520/2021 under Sections 427/380 of the IPC.
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a family dispute has arisen between the petitioners and the informant relating to some domestic
issues and ancestral properties. The Petitioner No. 1’s late husband and petitioner No. 2’s late father was the son of the informant. These
disputes have arisen after the death of the husband of the petitioner No. 1. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this is the third FIR
filed by the informant against the petitioners relating to the same disputes. In respect of earlier first FIR, bail was granted to the petitioners. The
learned counsel for the petitioners refers to Annexure-2 page 47 of the petition to submit that the interim bail was granted to the petitioners by this
Court in connection with the second FIR filed by the informant. This Court in A.B. No. 1769/2021 vide order dated 25.06.2021 had granted interim
bail to the petitioners in connection with Bharalumukh P.S. Case No. 472/2021 registered under Sections 406/420/468/34 of the IPC. In respect of the
present case lodged before the Bharalumukh Police Station by the same informant, the petitioners have been directed to appear before the
Investigating Officer and notice under Section 41A has been served on the petitioners directing them to appear before the Investigating Officer on or
before 03.07.2021. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the earlier two FIRs filed by the informant, there is strong
apprehension that the petitioners may be arrested in connection to the present case.
Ms. S. Jahan, learned Addl. PP for the State submits that at this stage case diary be called for.
Upon hearing the learned counsels for the parties, let the case diary be called for.
In the meantime, it is provided that in the event of arrest of the petitioners, named above, in connection with the above noted case, they shall be
released on interim pre-arrest bail, upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) each with one surety of like amount to
the satisfaction of the arresting authority, subject, of course, to the following conditions:
(i) That the petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer in terms of Section 41A dated 30.06.2021 and on such other dates as may be
required;
(ii) That the petitioners shall not hamper or tamper with the investigation in any manner;
(iii) That the petitioners shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so
as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; and
(iv) That the petitioners shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction of the Bharalumukh P.S without obtaining prior written permission from the concerned
Investigating Officer of the case.
If any of the conditions are found to be violated then the Investigating Officer shall be at liberty to seek cancellation of the interim bail granted to the
petitioners.
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that since the connected bail petition in A.B. No. 1769/2021 is fixed on 14.07.2021, it is submitted that
present petition be also fixed on the same date along with instant anticipatory bail petition.
Let this matter be listed on 14.07.2021 along with A.B. No. 1769/2021 for production of the case diary.
