High CourtsSingle Bench

Laxmi Vaishnav vs State Of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 18 January 2024 · Citation: (2024) 01 RAJ CK 0082

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Garg, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 306
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 533 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 253 words

Manoj Kumar Garg, J

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.50/2023 registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Nagaur for the offence punishable under Section 306 of the IPC.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a lady and there is no evidence against the petitioner for abetment to commit the suicide. Challan of the present case has already been presented and no investigation is pending against the petitioner. The petitioner is in the judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time. Therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner.

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

I have considered the arguments advanced before me and gone through the material available on record.

Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail.

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner - Laxmi Vaishnav W/o Shri Raghuveer shall be enlarged on bail in FIR No.50/2023 registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Nagaur provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for her appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.