High CourtsSingle Bench

Lloyd Finance Ltd. (M/s.) vs Arvind Saraf and Another

Delhi High Court · Decided on 13 September 1999 · Citation: (2000) 3 AD 319

HON’BLE JUDGES
Mukul Mudgal, J
CASE NUMBER
Suit No. 1537 of 1998
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 171 words

Mukul Mudgal, J.—This suit is filed by the plaintiff for recovery of Rs. 2,98,39,505/- together with pendentelite and future interest under Order xxxvII CPC.

2.

Defendants were served on 21st August, 1998 with summons in the form No. 4 prescribed under Order xxxvII. Till today no application for leave to defend has been filed.

3.

The suit is based on a written contract and is maintainable under Order xxxvII. Hence the plaintiff is entitled to a decree under Order xxxvII Rule 2(3) CPC. The plaintiff shall also be entitled to pendentelite and future interest.

4.

The suit as prayed for is accordingly decreed against defendant No. 1 for Rs. 2,98,39,505/- as principal amount with interest @ 24% per annum from the date of the suit i.e. 27th July, 1998 till the date of decree and @ 8% per annum from the date of decree till the date of realization. The plaintiff shall be entitled to costs.

5.

The suit is decreed accordingly. Decree sheet be drawn up in the above terms.