High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 06 MAD CK 0001

L.R.Kumari vs The Commissioner of Police, & Anr.

Madras High Court · Decided on 19 June 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
M.Duraiswamy
CASE NUMBER
15196 of 2017 and W M P No 16467 of 2017

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

28 paragraphs · 560 words
1.

The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a writ of mandamus, forbearing the respondents, their men, agents, from interfering with

the peaceful conduct of business i.e. Cross massage in the name and style of ""Mookambika Ayurvedic Centre"" at No.3, Sangothiamman Koil 1st

Cross Steet, Sembakkam, Chennai - 600 073.

2.

According to the petitioner, the business is carried on in accordance with law for the past one year. The petitioner has also stated that the local

Inspector of Police and Police men are frequently coming and interfering with the business activities and thereby, causing hardship to the customers

coming to the premises for Traditional Ayurveda Massage. In order to prevent hardship, the petitioner has come forward with the present Writ

Petition.

3.

This Court, in similar circumstances, following the ratio laid down by this court in the judgment report in 2015(1) MLJ 308 [Masti Health and

Beauty Private limited & Others V. The Commissioner of Police, Chennai City], disposed of the Writ Petition in W.P.No.9380 of 2016, by order

dated 14.03.2016, by directing the respondents-police to comply with the directions/conditions imposed in paragraph 67 of the order in the

judgment reported in 2015(1) MLJ 308 (cited supra) and further made it clear that the petitioner therein under the guise of carrying on business

activity shall not indulge in any unlawful or illegal activities detrimental to law and order or public order.

4.

Since the issue involved in the present Writ Petition is identical to the issue involved in W.P.No.9380 of 2016, it is relevant to extract para 67 of

the order passed in 2015(1) MLJ 308 (cited supra), which reads as follows:-

67.In the light of the above, all the writ petitions are disposed of to the following effect :

(i) The respondents shall not, as a matter of routine and without any basis, conduct any raids and interfere with the business carried

on by the petitioners;

(ii) In specific cases where the police have reasonable grounds to believe that an offence punishable under the Immoral Traffic

(Prevention) Act has been or is being committed, it is open to the police to take action, after scrupulously following all the steps

indicated in Section 15 of the said Act. The steps to be followed are narrated by me in paragraph 28 above; and

(iii) Based upon the laws enacted in various States of the United States of America and Singapore, which I have dealt with in

paragraphs 39 to 54, the respondents may take appropriate steps for bringing in either a new legislation or a subordinate legislation in

terms of the provisions of the Chennai City Municipal Corporation Act or the Chennai City Police Act, so that public order, decency

and morality, which can form the basis for a regulatory law under Article 19(2) of The Constitution, are taken care of. ...

5.

In the light of the said order, the Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the respondents-police to comply with the directions imposed in para

67 of the order as extracted above. It is also made clear that the petitioner under the guise of carrying on business activity shall not indulge in any

unlawful or illegal activities detrimental to law and order or public order.

6.

With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.