AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
4 paragraphs · 156 wordsManoj Kumar Garg, J
Instant cr. misc. application has been filed by the petitioner-applicant seeking correction in the order dated 09.04.2024 passed by this Court in SB Cr. Revision Petition No.374/2024 by which the revision petition was allowed and the juvenile was ordered to be released on bail.
Counsel for the petitioner-applicant submits that inadvertently due to typographical error, in the order dated 09.04.2024, the words “natural guardian (father)” have wrongly been mentioned, instead of words “legal guardian (grand-father Kewal Singh)”. Counsel prays that necessary correction be made in the order dated 09.04.2024, passed by this Court.
In view of above submissions made and for reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. It is ordered that in the order dated 09.04.2024, the words “natural guardian (father)” be read as “legal guardian (grand-father Kewal Singh)”. To that limited extent, the order dated 09.04.2024 passed by this Court in SB Cr. Revision Petition No.374/2024 stands modified/corrected.