AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
6 paragraphs · 184 wordsIssue notice to the respondents.
Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents 1 and 2. Sri. Kalyan Basavaraj, learned counsel accepts notice for respondents 4 to 22.
It is the notice at Annexure-B, issued by the Assistant Commissioner convening the meeting to consider the motion of no confidence that has been called in question.
Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that there are certain allegations made in the complaint at Annexure-A and accordingly, motion of no confidence is to be treated to be one with allegations under Section 49(2) of the Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993.
Learned counsel for the members though would contest the said contention submits that in light of ambiguity and to ensure that there is no lapse in moving the motion of no confidence, they would not proceed with the complaint dated 16.12.2019.
In light of the said submission, petition is disposed off as requiring no further adjudication. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioners to move the motion of no confidence without any allegations, if they are so advised.
