High CourtsDivision Bench

Madan Baraik vs State Of Jharkhand

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 10 December 2020 · Citation: (2020) 12 JH CK 0049

HON’BLE JUDGES
H. C. Mishra, J · Rajesh Kumar, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 306
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal (D.B.) No. 863 Of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 189 words

Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the State on the interlocutory application filed on behalf of the appellant for

granting bail during the pendency of this appeal.

The appellant has been convicted and sentenced for the offence under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code.

The appellant is the husband of the deceased, who died due to burn injuries. The impugned Judgement shows that the parents of the deceased, who

were examined as witnesses, have not alleged any ill-motive or ill-treatment against the appellant except for the date of occurrence. The evidence of

the Doctor conducting the post-mortem examination shows that the burn injuries on the deceased could be self-inflicted.

In the facts of this case, we are inclined to release the appellant, Madan Baraik, on bail. Accordingly, the appellant, named above, is directed to be

released on bail, during the pendency of this appeal, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to

the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Simdega, in connection with S.T. No. 19 of 2017.

The aforesaid interlocutory application stands allowed.