AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
12 paragraphs · 201 wordsAnoop Chitkara, J
The petitioner, who is working as JBT, in Government Primary School, Kuru Kaloha Education Block, Rakkar, District Kangra, H.P. and is under
transfer to Government Primary School, Sullah, Education Block, Dadasiba, District Kangra, H.P., has come up before this Court seeking quashing of
the impugned order of transfer, Annexure P-1.
We have heard Mr. Arun Sehgal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Adarsh Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General for the
respondent-State.
In view of the nature of the order, we propose to pass, no response is required from the respondents.
Consequently, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make representation to the first respondent, mentioning therein the stations
of his choice and bad health conditions of his mother, within one week, in accordance with the transfer policy. On receipt of such representation, the
said respondent shall consider the same sympathetically, in the light of the transfer policy occupying the field, and pass appropriate orders, within two
weeks. Subject to filing of representation by the petitioner within the time-frame mentioned above, the interim order dated 23.6.2020 is extended till the
disposal of the representation. Pending application(s), if any, are closed.
