High CourtsDivision Bench(2023) 06 UK CK 0067

Madan Mohan Joshi vs State Of Uttarakhand & Another

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 19 June 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vipin Sanghi, CJ · Rakesh Thapliyal, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (S/B) No. 238 Of 2023

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 205 words

Vipin Sanghi, CJ

1) The petitioner challenged his transfer from Irrigation Section, Rudrapur to PMGSY Irrigation Section, Rudraprayag, on the ground of discrimination.

2) When the matter was heard on the last date, Mr. Mainali had specifically pointed out the case of Sri Lalit Mohan Kashyap, whose name stands at Sl. No. 11 of the transfer list, to say that he had been posted at Irrigation Section Kashipur, even though he had rendered larger service in sugam area, and lesser service in durgam area, compared to the petitioner. Respondents were required to take instruction. They have reported instructions, according to which, on account of spouse policy, Sri Lalit Mohan Yashyap has been retained in Kashipur.

3) Looking to the fact that the petitioner had rendered 06 years 06 months and 20 days of durgam service, as opposed to 12 years 03 months and 12 days service in sugam area, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned transfer, as it is a part of a larger exercise, involving 88 officers. Merely because the petitioner has rendered 01 years and 04 months service at his present posting at Rudrapur, is no reason to interfere with the said transfer.

4) The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.