High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 05 RAJ CK 0103

Madan Singh Bhati S/o Sh. Radhakrishan vs The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 22 May 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dinesh Mehta
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
5957 of 2017

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 231 words
1.

A copy of the writ petition has been supplied to Mr.

Harish Purohit, learned counsel for the respondent-

Corporation.

2.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the parties that

the dispute raised in the present writ petition has already

been adjudicated by this Court led by Daulat Ram V.

Chairman & Managing Director, RSRTC & Ors. : S.B. Civil

Writ Petition No. 9687/2015, decided on 01.10.2015 and, therefore, the present writ petition may also be disposed of in

light of the said judgment.

3.

This Court while deciding the case of Daulat Ram (supra)

directed as under: -

"In this background, these writ petitions deserves to be and are hereby allowed. The respondent Corporation is directed to reimburse the entire dues of all its retired employees under all heads including retiral benefits, overtime, night allowance, earned leave etc. within a period of six months. The due amount shall carry interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of accrual till the date of actual payment. The petitioners shall be at liberty to submit detailed representations to the concerned officers to settle the accounts and facilitate the assessment of the dues at the earliest. No order as to cost".

4.

In view of the above, the writ petition is also allowed in

the light of judgment in the case of Daulat Ram (supra) with

the same directions as quoted herein before.