AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
40 paragraphs · 813 wordsI.A. 2247/2020, 4th repeat application for grant of bail and suspension of sentence moved by the sole appellant u/Sec. 389(1) Cr.P.C. after dismissal of earlier one as withdrawn after arguing for some time is taken up and considered.
This criminal appeal assails the judgment dated 24.12.2018 passed in S.T.No.800362/2015 by Special Judge CBI (VYAPAM) and 4th Additional Session Judge Gwalior, District Gwalior whereby the appellant- Madhuraj Singh has been convicted and sentenced as under with default stipulations :-
Section
Imprisonment
Fine
120-B of IPC
1 years R.I.
Rs. 1000/-with default
Stipulation
420 r/w 120-B of IPC
3 years R.I
Rs. 1000/-with default
Stipulation
467 r/w 120-B of IPC
5 years R.I
Rs. 1000/-with default
Stipulation
468 r/w 120-B of IPC
5 years R.I
Rs. 1000/-with default
Stipulation
Learned counsel for the respondent opposed the said I.A. and prayed for its rejection by contending that on the basis of the allegations and the material available on record, no case for grant of bail is made out.
Appellant has been found to be the candidate in whose place the solver had appeared in the examination for recruitment on the post of Constable conducted by VYAPM.
Learned counsel has drawn attention of this Court to various extenuating circumstances and counsel for prosecution has also tried to point out incriminating circumstances.
Learned counsel for the appellant contends that appellant has suffered about 22 months of incarceration as against five years sentence awarded.
Considering the substantial period of sentence suffered by the appellant and looking to the fact that there is no likelihood of early disposal of the appeal in near future and considering the changed scenario in view of the Covid-19 pandemic, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the appellant by way of suspension of sentence.
Undoubtedly, the appellant is young/middle aged/able bodied responsible citizen. In the present time where the entire humanity is struggling to survive against the Covid-19 pandemic the governmental machinery is experiencing extreme shortage of hands in the process of disaster management, the appellant as citizen of nation is obliged to assist the govt. in times of this deep crises by discharging his fundamental duty enshrined under Article 51-A(d) which reads thus:-
"51A. Fundamental duties. - It shall be the duty of every citizen of India -
(a). XXX- XXX- XXX
(b). XXX- XXX- XXX
(c). XXX- XXX- XXX
(d). to defend the country and render national service when called upon to do so;"
Accordingly, this Court deems it appropriate to pass suitable order prescribing it to be a part of one of the conditions subject to which appellant has been granted bail so that the human resource in shape of the appellant can be utilized for the betterment of the society and to ward off the crises.
Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits, I.A. 2247/2020 is allowed and it is directed that the jail sentence of appellant will remain under suspension subject to verification that the amount of fine has been deposited, on the appellant's furnishing bail bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of concerned Magistrate for his appearance before the concerned Magistrate on 25/11/2020 and on such further dates as may be fixed by him which shall be of frequency not less than once a year.
In case, appellant is found absent on any date fixed by the concerned Magistrate then the said Magistrate shall be free to issue and execute warrant of arrest for securing his presence without first referring the matter to this Court, provided the Registry of this Court is kept informed.
The learned concerned Magistrate and the prosecution are directed to ensure following of Covid-19 precautionary protocol prescribed from time to time by the Supreme Court, the Central Govt. and as well as the State Govt during release, travel and residence of the appellant during period of suspension of sentence as a consequence of this order.
The appellant through his counsel undertakes that appellant shall register himself with the District Magistrate concerned as "Covid-19 Warriors" by entering his name in a Register named as COVID-19 WARRIOR REGISTER to be maintained in the o/o the concerned DM who in turn shall assign work to appellant of Covid-19 disaster management at the discretion of District Magistrate, by taking all prescribed precautions. The nature, quantum and duration of the work assigned is left to the the wisdom of District Magistrate, concerned. This Court expects that the appellant shall rise to the occasion to serve the society in this time of crises to discharge his fundamental duty of rendering national service when called upon to do so, as per Article 51- A(d) of the Constitution.
Registry is directed to communicate this order to the concerned District Magistrate for compliance.
A copy of this order be sent to the Court concerned for information.
C.c as per rules.
