AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
5 paragraphs · 445 wordsThe Court: Mr. Paritosh Sinha, Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the award holder has relied upon a reported Division Bench judgment of this Court in GA No. 922 of 2017, APOT No. 89 of 2017 and EC No. 1285 of 2015 (Magma Fincorp Limited Vs. Ashok Kumar & Ors.) dated 13th September, 2017, reported in 2018 (1) CHN (Cal) 391 where the Hon'ble Division Bench had considered the aspect of service of award upon the judgment-debtor. In deciding the said application, the Hon'ble Division Bench has referred to Clause 9(b) of the arbitration agreement between the parties in the said proceeding, Section 114 of the Indian Evidence Act, Section 3 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act and Chapter VI of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898. Similar clause as that of Clause 9(b) that was considered by the Hon'ble Division Bench is present in the instant arbitration agreement. The records reveal that the envelopes said to contain the award was forwarded by the Arbitral Tribunal by a letter dated 30th November, 2017. The envelope was addressed to the respondents at the address mentioned in the arbitration agreement and proper stamps were affixed thereon. The Arbitrator has also paid postal charges by affixing prepaid adhesive postage stamps and the postal article duly put in by registered post in the manner provided in Chapter VI of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898. The postal envelop said to contain the said award was despatched on 19th December, 2017. Although no acknowledgement due card is received by the arbitrator but having regard to the fact that the award was sent to the last known address of the judgment debtors, it shall be presumed that the award has been duly served upon the judgment debtors. The time to challenge the award has, in the meantime, expired. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the award is not under challenge.
Under such circumstances, it shall be presumed that the award has been duly served upon the judgment-debtors. In view of the Hon'ble Division Bench judgment and having regard to the factual position as discussed above, in my view, the award-holder is able to demonstrate service of the award upon the judgment-debtors.
The judgment debtors are directed to file their individual affidavit of assets in Form No. 16A Appendix E of the Code of Civil Procedure on or before 22.01.2019; failing which warrant of arrest may be issued against the judgement-debtor.
The matter stands adjourned till 29.01.2019.
The petitioner shall communicate this order along with a copy of the application upon the judgment debtors within a week from date and shall file affidavit of service on the adjourned date.
