High CourtsSingle Bench

Mahabir vs State Of Haryana

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 5 March 2021 · Citation: (2021) 03 P&H CK 0085

HON’BLE JUDGES
Raj Mohan Singh, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 294, 506 · Scheduled Caste And Scheduled Tribe (Prevention Of Atrocities) Act, 1989 — Section 3(2)(Va) · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438, 438(2)
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 44441 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

22 paragraphs · 390 words

Raj Mohan Singh, J

Petitioner seeks grant of anticipatory bail in case bearing FIR No.297 dated 17.08.2020 registered under Sections 294, 506, 34 IPC & Section 3 (2)

(Va), SC & ST Act, 1989, at Police Station Kanina, District Mohindergarh.

Notice of motion was issued on 01.01.2021 by passing the following order:-

“Counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that on an earlier occasion, FIR No.15 dated 08.01.2020 was registered against the petitioner by

Ramotar, the complainant. Thereafter, FIR No.222 was lodged by Sunita against the complainant as he had misbehaved with her on 15.02.2020. It

was further mentioned in the FIR that the petitioner was sitting at the Police Station when she had come to lodge the said FIR since he is residing in

her house and had helped her. It is, thus, submitted that for the same incident, the complainant has now involved the petitioner along with Sunita and

her sons and the FIR has been lodged after a period of 6 months. It is further submitted that the petitioner being a police official would be suspended

on account of his arrest, causing irreparable loss to him. Reliance has been placed upon the judgment of the Apex Court in Prathvi Raj Chauhan Vs.

UOI & others 2020 (2) SCC (Crl.) 657, to submit that the power could be exercised under Section 438 Cr.P.C. where the complainant fails to make

out a case under the provisions of the SC & ST Act, 1989.

Notice of motion for 05.03.2021. Mr.Swaroop accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.

In the meantime, petitioner shall join investigation and in the event of arrest of the petitioner, he shall be released on ad-interim bail subject to the

satisfaction of the investigation officer. The petitioner shall join investigation as and when required and shall comply with the conditions laid down in

Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.â€​

(G.S. SANDHAWALIA)

January 01, 2021 JUDGE sailesh

Learned State counsel on instructions from DSP Rajiv Kumar HPS, submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation on 12.02.2021 and is not

required for further investigation in the case.

In view of the submission made by learned State counsel, order dated 01.01.2021 is made absolute. However, petitioner shall keep on joining the

investigation as and when required to do so and he shall abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.