High CourtsSingle Bench(2020) 01 PAT CK 0239

Mahant Maheshwar Das vs Bihar State Religious Trust Board And Ors

Patna High Court · Decided on 16 January 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 246 Of 2020

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 405 words
1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned AC to SC 25 for the State and learned counsel for the Bihar State Board of Religious Trusts (hereinafter referred to as the 'Board').

2.

The petitioner has moved the Court for the following reliefs:

"(1) For quashing of the order dated 10.10.2019 passed by the Chairman, Bihar State Religious Trust Board, Patna whereby and whereunder Respondent no. 5 namely Mahant Ramraji @ Surendra Das has been arbitrarily and illegally declared as the Mahant of Madhuban Kabirpanthi Math, Madhuban, District-Samastipur.

(ii) For a direction to the Respondent no. 2, the Chairman, Bihar State Religious Trust Board, Patna to declare the petitioner as the Mahant of Madhuban Kabirpanthi Math, Madhuban, District- Samastipur being the Legal Chela/Successor of Late Mahant Remeshwar Das.

(III). For any other appropriate relief/reliefs to which the petitioners are found entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case."

3.

At the very outset, learned counsel for the Board submitted that there is a statutory forum of appeal before the District Judge of the concerned district under Section 48 of the Bihar Hindu Religious Trusts Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act').

4.

Learned counsel for the Board submitted that since permission has to be sought by the petitioner, the same shall be granted to move before the District Judge under Section 48 of the Act.

5.

Faced with the situation, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition be disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to approach the said forum.

6.

Having regard to the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to move under Section 48 of the Act, before the District Judge, Samastipur in the matter.

7.

If the petitioner seeks such permission from the Board within two weeks from today, the Board shall grant the same within one week from the date of filing such application by the petitioner. Thereafter, from the date the Board grants permission, the petitioner shall file appropriate application before the District Judge, Samastipur under Section 48 of the Act within three weeks from the date of grant of permission by the Board. Thereafter, the District Judge, Samastipur shall ensure that the matter is taken to its logical conclusion expeditiously and latest within a period of four months from the date of filing of such application, in accordance with law, after giving opportunity of hearing to all concerned.