AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
S. Ravindra Bhat, J
Petitioners’ claim in these proceedings is that the compensation determined by the Collector and later the reference under Sections 30/31 of the
Land Acquisition Act, 1894, for appropriation of shares of persons interested in the compensation, has not been decided. A reference was sought
under Section 30/31 of The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (the old act) (LAC No.20/2004; LAC old No.106/80). The reference was made on 24.
04.2004. On the basis of the said order and the Award made, the petitioners had earlier sought appropriate orders under Section 28A of old Act on
20.11.2004.It is stated that despite pendency of the proceedings, for the last 11 years and several reminders, LAC has not taken any active steps in
deciding the application.
The writ petition is pending for last two years. Respondent-GNCTD has chosen not to file any reply despite several opportunities. Given the state of
pleadings, it is apparent that the petitioner is seeking enhanced compensation under Section 28A of the old Act on the basis of parity having regard to
the order made by the Reference Court under Sections 30 & 31 of The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 under previous Award. The concerned Land
Acquisition Collector is hereby directed to dispose of petitioner’s application under Section 28A of the old Act within twelve weeks from today
after considering the material on record and hearing the concerned parties, in accordance with law, in case yet not decided.
The writ petition is disposed of with aforesaid directions.
