High CourtsSingle Bench

Mahendra vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 14 February 2020 · Citation: (2020) 02 MP CK 0065

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anand Pathak, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 344, 365, 376(D), 376(2)(n)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 5854 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

38 paragraphs · 339 words

Shri Mahavir Pathak, learned counsel for the complainant.

Prosecutrix present in person alongwith her grand-father.

With consent heard finally.

The applicant has filed this first application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C for grant of bail, who has been arrested and is in custody since 24-11-2019 in

connection with Crime No.575/2019 registered at Police Station, Kotwali Ashoknagar, District Ashoknagar, for the offence punishable under Sections

344, 365, 376-D, 376(2)(n) of IPC.

It is the submission of learned counsel for the applicant that false case has been registered against him and he is suffering confinement since

24.11.2019, whereas charge-sheet has already been filed. It is further submitted that prosecutrix and applicant have entered into wedlock and before

arrest they were living as couple. Even today prosecutrix intends to live with the applicant as his wife, and therefore, she is living at his residence.

Considering the fact situation, chance of tampering with evidence/witness is remote. He undertakes to perform community service. Thus, prayed for

bail.

Learned Public Prosecutor for the State opposed the prayer and prayed for dismissal of the application.

Learned counsel for the complainant on the basis of instructions from the prosecutrix fairly submits that prosecutrix is major and she can take her

decision. He extended his no objection if the bail is granted.

Considering the submissions advanced, looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, but without commenting on the merits of the case, the

application is allowed. It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty

Thousand Only) with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of Trial Court concerned.

This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicant:-

1.

2.

/

3.

,

, / ,

;

4.

5.

6.

/ ;

7.

2 ( /)

◌◌, “ ,

â€​ 6-8 /

, 30

/ ,

( ) “ â€​

/ ,

,

,

, ,

“ â€​

Certified copy as per rules.