High CourtsSingle Bench

Mahendra Munda vs State Of Jharkhand

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 5 January 2021 · Citation: (2021) 01 JH CK 0047

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anil Kumar Choudhary, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 201, 302, 376 · Protection Of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Section 4, 6
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 10317 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

17 paragraphs · 371 words

Heard the parties through video conferencing. Learned counsel for the petitioner personally undertakes to remove the defects as pointed out by the

stamp reporter within two weeks after the lockdown period is over.

In view of the personal undertaking of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter are ignored for the present.

The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Sonahatu P.S. Case No.19 of 2019 corresponding to POCSO Case No. 48 of

2019 registered under sections 302/201/ 376/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under section 4/6 of the POCSO Act.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed rape and murder of the

deceased girl. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and there is no eye- witness to the occurrence nor the

petitioner has been named in the F.I.R. It is then submitted that so far three witnesses have been examined in this case, the certified copy of the

depositions of whom has been annexed herewith as annexure-2 (page nos. 18-21) of the brief. It is further submitted that none of the three witnesses

examined in this case have supported the case of the prosecution. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 20.03.2019 as has

been mentioned in paragraph no. 14 of the bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case.

Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.

The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to

enlarge the above named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees

Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Judicial Commissioner-IV-cum-Spl. Judge

(POCSO), Ranchi, in connection with Sonahatu P.S. Case No.19 of 2019 corresponding to POCSO Case No. 48 of 2019 with the condition that he

will cooperate with the trial of the case.