High CourtsDivision Bench

Mahendra Pal Singh Parmar vs State Of Uttarakhand And Another

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 10 June 2026 · Citation: (2026) 06 UK CK 0582

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Gupta, CJ · Subhash Upadhyay, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/B) No. 27 Of 2025
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 94 words
1.

The petitioner has challenged Condition No. 5(10) of the Advertisement dated 29.01.2025 on basis of which the bid of the petitioner was rejected in the technical round.

2.

Learned Brief Holder states that the respondents have revised their decision and have duly considered the bid of the petitioner and on that basis, even LOI was issued in his favour.

3.

In view of the above, the challenge made in the writ petition has become infructuous.

4.

The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of as infructuous.

5.

Pending application, if any, also stands dismissed.