High CourtsSingle Bench

Mahesh Chandra Alias Chota vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 25 June 2024 · Citation: (2024) 06 UK CK 0111

HON’BLE JUDGES
Alok Kumar Verma, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 120B, 420, 467, 468, 471
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 1186 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 475 words

Alok Kumar Verma, J

1.

This Application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed for regular bail in connection with the First Information Report No. 281 of 2023, registered at police station Kotwali Dehradun, District Dehradun.

2.

The applicant-Mahesh Chandra alias Chota is in judicial custody under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

3.

As per the case of the prosecution, the applicant and the co-accused entered into a criminal conspiracy to prepare false sale deeds/title deeds. The forged sale deeds/title deeds were prepared and replaced with the original sale deeds/title deeds kept in the Sub-Registrar Office, Dehradun. Mutation proceedings have also been initiated on the basis of the said false deeds. During the investigation, it was found that the present applicant used to write sale deeds/title deeds on the instruction of one co-accused-Kunwar Pal.

4.

Heard Mr. Dheeraj Joshi, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Rakesh Negi, learned Brief Holder for the State.

5.

Mr. Dheeraj Joshi, Advocate, contended that the applicant has been implicated in the present matter. Applicant was a Clerk (Munshi) of co-accused Kunwar Pal, Advocate. The alleged false sale deeds/title deeds were sent to Forensic Science Laboratory. The report of Laboratory is not conclusive. The co-accused-Kunwar Pal has died. The alleged forged deeds have not yet been declared forged by any competent Court. Applicant is not a previous convict. He is in custody since 04.10.2023. He is a permanent resident of District Saharanpur (Uttar Pradesh), therefore, there is no chance of his absconding. Charge-sheet has already been filed and eight co-accused have already been granted bail by this Court.

6.

On the other hand, Mr. Rakesh Negi, learned Brief Holder has opposed the bail application orally.

7.

Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for both the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case, no reason is found to keep the applicant behind the bars for an indefinite period, therefore, without expressing any opinion as to the merit of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage.

8.

The Bail Application is allowed.

9.

Let the applicant – Mahesh Chandra alias Chota be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned on the following conditions:-

i) Applicant shall attend the Trial Court regularly and he shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment;

ii) Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of this case.

10.

It is clarified that if the applicant misuses or violates any of the conditions, imposed upon him, the prosecution agency will be free to move the court for cancellation of bail.