High CourtsSingle Bench

Mahesh Kumar R vs State Of Karnataka

Karnataka High Court · Decided on 1 June 2022 · Citation: (2022) 06 KAR CK 0003

HON’BLE JUDGES
H.P. Sandesh, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 37, 109, 120B, 143, 147, 148, 149, 201, 302, 504
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Petition No. 1705 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 605 words

H.P. Sandesh, J

1.

This petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail of the petitioner/accused No.6 in Crime No.118/2021 of Nelamangala Town Police Station, Nelamangala Sub-Division, Bengaluru District, for the offence punishable under Sections 37, 109, 120-B, 143, 147, 148, 201, 302 and 504 read with Section 149 of IPC.

2.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the respondent-State.

3.

The factual matrix of the case of the prosecution is that on 19.09.2021 at around 7.30 p.m., there was a quarrel between this petitioner and also the victim. In respect of the said quarrel, this petitioner had informed his friend i.e., accused No.1 through phone and again, there was a quarrel between the accused No.1 and victim over the phone and hence, all the other accused persons have secured the victim and conspired with each other and committed the murder of the victim.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the only allegation against this petitioner is that, at his instance, the quarrel has started between the other assailants and he committed the offence of abetment and this petitioner was not present at the time of committing the murder and with regard to the abetment is concerned, the same has to be proved during the course of trial. The counsel would also submit that this petitioner is in custody from 23.09.2021 and investigation has already been completed and charge sheet is filed and his custody is not required. Hence, he may be enlarged on bail.

5.

Per contra, learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the respondent-State also not disputes the fact that quarrel has taken place at the instance of this petitioner and the same was informed to accused No.1 over phone and thereafter, rivalry has developed between them and hence, committed the murder of the victim.

6.

Having heard the respective counsel and also on perusal of the material on record, except the allegation that he is the part of abetment for committing the murder of the victim, no other allegation against this petitioner and he was not present at the time of committing the murder and he was also not a part of unlawful assembly in furtherance of the common object. When such being the material on record, except the allegation that quarrel has taken place at the instance of this petitioner, that too over phone, no other allegation against this petitioner and taking note of the allegation made in the charge sheet, I am of the opinion that, it is a fit case to exercise the powers under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., subject to imposing certain conditions to protect and safeguard the interest of the prosecution. Hence, I pass the following:-

ORDER

The Petition is allowed. Consequently, the petitioner/accused No.6 shall be released on bail in Crime No.118/2021 of Nelamangala Town Police Station, Nelamangala Sub-Division, Bengaluru District, for the offence punishable under Sections 37, 109, 120-B, 143, 147, 148, 201, 302 and 504 read with Section 149 of IPC, subject to the following conditions:

(i) The petitioner shall execute personal bond for a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs only) with two sureties for the like-sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court.

(ii) The petitioner shall not indulge in tampering the prosecution witnesses.

(iii) The petitioner shall appear before the jurisdictional Court on all the future hearing dates, unless exempted by the Court for any genuine cause.

(iv) The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Trial Court without prior permission of the Court, till the case registered against him is disposed of.